i have some sympathy for that viewpoint. it's wrong to use a disaster to score cheap political points.
but it's also worth remembering that not all political points are cheap. criticism of a politician can get him to act better the next time a disaster strikes:
Eager to show it has learned from the slow responses to the Asia-Pacific tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, the White House announced Sunday evening that it would provide an "initial contribution" of $50 million for relief efforts in Pakistan.so remember next time: sometimes playing politics produces better results. isn't that how a representative democracy is supposed to work?