Biden's presidency has been much better than I expected (admittedly I had low expectations and supported him almost entirely because he wasn't Trump), but this is a phenomenally bad idea.
Why the fuck would Biden want to agree to a mutual defense treaty like the US-South Korea or US-Japan defense treaty? Even though the treaty would be worded as a two-way street (that's what "mutual defense") means, the reality is that if the US was facing a serious threat KSA has little it can bring to the table to defend America whereas the US can do a lot to defend the KSA. So really it would just be an open ended commitment to risk American lives to defend a wealthy absolute dictatorship with a horrible human rights record and which, by law, treats women and religious minorities like complete shit. This is the same regime that murdered an American resident with a bone saw and Biden himself vowed to make a pariah during his presidential campaign. Meanwhile, even as Biden is trying to give the Saudis a big kiss, the Saudi government is working hard to make inflation rise in the U.S. so Biden loses the presidency next year.
What is Biden said that he would agree to defend Saudi Arabia so long as the price of oil was less than $80/barrel? I wouldn't like that either, but at least it would have some concrete benefit for the U.S.
I realize that Biden really wants an Israel-KSA peace treaty on his watch, but such a treaty would be more about symbolism than substance. The fact is that Saudi Arabia and Israel have been quietly cooperating and in an informal cooperative agreement for almost a decade. This would be just making official something that has already been happening, and will continue to happen even if they don't have a formal peace agreement. In other words, Biden would be paying a high price (endless American commitment to defend Saudi Arabia) for little actual gain. Is this just about getting a Mideast peace agreement because Trump did?
What is Biden said that he would agree to defend Saudi Arabia so long as the price of oil was less than $80/barrel? I wouldn't like that either, but at least it would have some concrete benefit for the U.S.