Wednesday, August 13, 2003

i haven't written much here related to my job as a labor lawyer (aside from occasional complaints about deadlines, etc.) in part, its because nathan newman does a better job than i could ever hope to. also, when i am not working, i tend to want to write about other interests that are not related to my work. the work stuff i mull over all day, when i have a chance to blog i am usually trying to get something off my chest that i haven't had the chance to yet. thus, i often write about foreign issues because that's one of my major interests that does not at all relate to the labor issues i deal with at work.

at least most of the time. here's one of the rare stories where foreign policy and labor rights intersect (this is a press release relating to a story that the press is apparently not bothering with):

u.s. arrests iraqi labor leaders

On Saturday, August 2, at 11:30 p.m., Baghdad local time, U.S. occupation forces arrested Qasim Hadi and fifty-four other Iraqi leaders and members of the Union of the Unemployed in Iraq who had been engaged in a five-day sit-in protest of the treatment of unemployed Iraqi workers by occupation forces and U.S. corporations granted contracts for work in Iraq.  We are informed that the detained workers were released only after the intervention of representatives of the United Nations.

These were not armed combatants.  They were not terrorists.  These were unemployed workers peacefully protesting, exercising their democratic right to seek redress for their grievances.

U.S. Labor Against War joins with the International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples and the International Confederation of Arab Trade Unions to unequivocally condemn these arrests.  The U.S. cannot claim to be acting in the interests of the Iraqi people with the objective of establishing a democratic government in Iraq while violating internationally recognized labor and human rights of Iraqi workers who seek to exercise their democratic rights to peacefully protest and seek redress for their grievances.

The bedrock of any democracy is the right of dissent and the right to seek redress for grievances against the ruling order.  One of the principal building blocks of a democratic government and society is the existence and operation of an independent labor movement.  Iraq is signatory to more than fifty of the International Labor Organization Conventions on labor rights, at the center of which is the right to organize and to protest treatment and conditions.  U.S. and other occupation forces are obligated to respect and honor those Conventions.

We call upon the U.S. and other occupation forces to immediately and fully respect all of the rights guaranteed by the ILO Conventions. Further, we call for the immediate withdrawal from Iraq of all U.S., British and other combatant forces.  The U.S. and other Coalitionpartners in the invasion of Iraq are morally and legally obligated instead to provide whatever resources are required to meet that country's humanitarian needs and for reconstruction and repair of damages caused by their military actions.

In pursuit of these objectives, we have launched an International Campaign for Iraqi Labor Rights.  We are committed to support Iraqi workers as they organize their own independent, democratic labor movement free of interference by employers and all external interests.  Accordingly, we intend to send an international delegation of labor leaders to Iraq to monitor the observance of labor rights there.  Details about this delegation will be forthcoming.


(via the bittershack of resentment)

thanks to bush's executive order giving blanket immunity to american oil companies in iraq, it would seem that the labor leaders are facing a major uphill battle, at least in iraq's largest industry. (and that's assuming there is a legal system to speak of that they can resort to)