are kristol and bolton making some kind of implied election-season pitch for the mccain presidency directed at those who don't want to see a strike against iran?
"vote for mccain if you don't want iran attacked before inauguration day (so that mccain can attack them later on)" is a strange pitch indeed. for some reason i don't think it will prove very appealing to those who don't want a strike against iran.
then again, both kristol and bolton seem to think that attacking iran would be a good thing. so wouldn't the argument also go the other way? will kristol and bolton put their money where their predictions are and jump on the obama train? by their own logic that seems to be the best way to get their beloved iran strike stat.
