Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Reviewing Trump's surrender agreement with Iran

If this is the real agreement, there are a lot of big deal terms in the U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement. The ones that really jump out at me:

  • The agreement says that it is binding on the U.S. and "their allies in the current war" (i.e. Israel) (Para. 1)
  • The agreement requires "an immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon" (Para. 1)
  • The agreement requires that the parties don't just stop shooting at each other but also "refrain from the threat" of force as well. (Para. 1) Trump arguably violated that part of the agreement this morning.
  • The U.S. commits to withdrawing its forces "from the surrounding area" within 30 days of signing. (para. 4) I'm not sure what the "surrounding area" means, but the U.S. has permanent bases in Turkey, Kuwait, Iraq, Bahrain, and Qatar that are all arguably in the "surrounding area." It is hard to believe that the U.S. agreed to dismantle any of those bases (the Turkish bases are really NATO bases) so maybe this just means the U.S. will withdraw some battleships from the Persian Gulf. But again, the U.S. has regularly had battleships in the Persian Gulf (the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet is in Bahrain). I don't know how to read this without thinking it might mean a draw down of U.S. forces from the region from what they had before the war with Iran. At the same time, I can't believe the U.S. actually agreed to that.
  • Immediately after signing, Iran gets all U.S. sanctions over the sale of its oil removed, including related limitations on its "banking, insurance, transportation, and the like." (para. 10) If I am understanding this correctly, this is a huge concession to Iran allowing it to sell oil completely sanction free for the first time in decades. This is especially good for Iran because it applies "immediately" when oil prices are still high from Strait of Hormuz's closure before the effects of the agreement fully change the market price.
  • The U.S. is also committing to and all sanctions against Iran, both "primary and secondary" in the final agreement (which may never happen) (para. 7)
  • The agreement states that "frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be released and made fully available." (para. 11) While it does not say this will happen "immediately" upon signing (like some other provisions do), it also does not talk about any delay before this provision applies so it seems to mean it will happen right away. This is another massive concession to Iran. The U.S. is holding approximately $2 billion is Iranian assets, as well as real estate worth approximately $50 million. Most of these assets have been frozen since the Iranian revolution in 1979 and Iran has never fully recovered control of those assets, even under the Obama nuclear deal with Iran. Plus there are a total of between $100 billion and $120 billion in frozen assets in the rest of the world, mostly because of U.S. pressure and UN security council resolutions. Because the agreement says it "will be approved through a binding resolution of the UN Security Council" (para. 14) that could mean that the Iran will regain control of all of its assets for the first time since the current regime took control of the country.
  • In addition to those amounts, Iran will get another $300 billion "for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran" within 60 days of signing. (para. 6) Because this is a separate paragraph from the paragraphs about unfreezing Iranian assets and sanction relief, this appears to just be a cash payment on top of all of that, essentially war reparations.
  • The agreement does say that Iran "reiterates" it will never produce nuclear weapons. (para. 8) This looks like something that Iran has conceded, but it really isn't. The word "reiterates" is key. Iran has been saying it will never produce a nuclear weapon for decades. It committed to that in the JCPOA and it said it repeatedly both before and after that agreement. In the 1990s, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa declaring nuclear weapons to be contrary to Islam, which would mean that the Islamic Republic of Iran could never produce such weapons. But Iran-hawks in the U.S. and Israel simply did not believe Iran's multiple pronouncements against developing nuclear weapons. If they didn't believe Iran before, why would they believe them now? I don't see this "reiteration" as contributing anything that the world didn't already have from Iran.
  • Until a final agreement is reached, Iran is allowed to maintain "the status quo" of its nuclear program. (para. 11) Which means that while all the goodies Iran (the payment of reparations, the unfreezing of assets, the end of sanctions, the removal of U.S. forces) will happen either immediately or within 60 days, they don't have to give up anything else--meaning nuclear material will not be removed from the country--until that mythical final agreement is reached, if ever.
  • Iran does not even have to start negotiating the final agreement until the U.S. blockade of the Strait is removed, Iran is allowed to sell its oil without any U.S. sanctions, and its assets are unfrozen. (para. 13) In other words, Iran gets most of its goodies before they even have to discuss making any concessions to the U.S.
I don't see how anyone can see this as anything other than a complete capitulation of the Trump Administration to Iran. Iran has conceded nothing that it has not conceded before and in return for that nothing is getting an end to all U.S. sanctions, the removal of U.S. forces that threaten it, a return of its assets that the U.S. seized almost 50 years ago, and an extra $300 billion dollar payment on top of that. Also, the U.S. needs to force Israel to stop invading Lebanon somehow, with no requirement that Iran rein in Hezbollah or any of its other allied forces in the region.


Friday, June 12, 2026

Call it what is it

 This is human trafficking:

The Trump administration is preparing to deport nearly two dozen people to the Central African Republic on Thursday, including at least two Iranian women who had sought refuge in the United States, according to lawyers and a government official.

The migrants have no ties to the country, and it is unclear where they will live or whether they could ultimately be sent back to Iran. The U.S. government has documented significant human rights abuses in the Central African Republic, including unlawful killings, torture and arbitrary arrest and detention.


Friday, May 29, 2026

Everything the President Does Reflects the Fact that He is a Deeply Damaged Individual

 Buried in a NYT article about negotiations to end the U.S./Israel-Iran War:

Mr. Trump has told advisers he will not sign off on any deal in which the United States can be said to be giving direct cash payments to Iran. One U.S. official described this as a “public relations” challenge, acknowledging that some form of financial relief would be required for Iran. Mr. Trump has attacked President Barack Obama for years over sending “pallets of cash” to Iran to settle a decades-old financial dispute, timed after Mr. Obama’s 2015 nuclear deal.

Given that political reality, Mr. Trump’s team has been developing ideas that would involve other countries, including the Qataris, releasing funds to the Iranians — so that the U.S. could say it did not replenish the coffers of Iran’s regime. But it is not clear whether that political sleight-of-hand would quiet the many critics who are already noting that while Mr. Obama shipped $1.7 billion to Iran, Mr. Trump is looking at potentially unfreezing many times that amount.

So President Deals hasn't been able to reach an agreement with Iran because, while he is willing to pay Iran reparations for the illegal war, he needs to launder the money through a third country to make it look like he isn't paying Iran because that is too much like what the black guy did.


Friday, May 22, 2026

Trump's primary success might be a sign of upcoming failure

 Lots of commentary has been made about how many Republicans who crossed Trump (even if just occasionally) are losing their primaries to Trump-endorsed candidates. This has been portrayed as a show of strength. And I suppose it is in the sense that Trump has an increasingly iron grip over his own party.

But there is another way to look at this. Trump's support among the general public is in free fall. While Trump supporters remain loyal, the number of people who call themselves Trump supporters is going down. And since the modern Republican Party is Trump's party those who are not 100% on board are leaving the GOP.

So we have a shrinking party, with people leaving because they are disappointed in Trump. Which means that those who don't leave are the Trump loyalist who are left. It's a shrinking pool, but only the people who are still in the pool can vote in the GOP primary.

In other words, maybe Trump's recent primary victories is more of a reflection of the Republican party's overall loss with the total population. As the party shrinks the original coalition of MAGA plus "mainstream Republicans" (i.e. Republicans who disagree with Trump 1% of the time) starts to shed the mainstream Republicans. That leaves only the MAGA crowd who are going to listen to Trump when he tells them to slay his enemies in the primary. But that doesn't mean the party is strong, or that is will do well when the overall population votes. The Republicans who no longer feel at home in the party may stay home in the next election or cast a protest vote.

This is just my hypothesis. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it is just wishful thinking. But there are two clear trends: Trump's falling approval with the overall pubic, and Trump's better success at removing disloyal GOPers in the primary than he has had in the past. My hypothesis can at least explain both.


Monday, May 11, 2026

Finally a half-assed Trump brain fart I can get behind

Trump has apparently told Fox News' John Roberts that he is "seriously considering" making Venezuela the 51st State. Never mind that is not something a President has the power to do, or all the difficult questions the "U.S. State of Venezuela" would raise, I am hoping Trump pushes this plan just because it would give Stephen Miller a heart attack.


Friday, May 08, 2026

Where is this all going?

 So are we just going to have an almost daily string of bullshit announcements that a peace deal with Iran is right around the corner, interspersed with bombings and exchange of fire around the Persian Gulf, while the Straits of Hormuz remains mostly closed until the global economic fallout hits the U.S. economy hard enough for Trump to completely give up?

It seems to me that is where this is going, mostly because Trump is too emotionally fragile to admit that attacking Iran was a massive mistake. So he is going to do everything he can to deny it and pretend that his imaginary master dealmaking will rescue us until it becomes undeniable that it can't.