Sunday, May 23, 2010

rosenbaum peretz

i'm feeling pretty distant from american politics right now, so i haven't commented much on it here. at least not as much as i used to. but i still try to keep up, so i was struck by this bit in a NYT article about rand paul:
But Mr. Paul’s position is complicated. He has emerged as the politician most closely identified with the Tea Party movement. Its adherents are drawn to him because he has come forward as a kind of libertarian originalist, unbending in his anti-government stance.
(emphasis added)

at the beginning of the same article it says:
When Rand Paul, the victor in the Republican Senate primary last week in Kentucky, criticized the Civil Rights Act of 1964, singling out the injustice of non-discriminatory practices it imposed on private businesses, the resulting furor delighted Democrats and unsettled Republicans.

Mr. Paul hastened to state his abhorrence of racism and assert that had he served in the Senate in 1964, he would have voted for the measure.
it looks like he bended to me.